Leaderboard

Hello everyone As most players know, there is an old mechanic with making you stop winning ap from players when you gain too much of them in a short period of time. Originally this mechanic was made to prevent of ap trading between players when the ranking was still in AP. Actually the system is on ap and the cap ap is also good to prevent from ap trade (if u kill the same player x time in y mins you will not gain any ap...) with is good. But as i explain to Goldaion admins with are "probably" the same as EuroAion ones, this becomes a problem on mass pvp (At every siege, after 2 minutes i can't win any ap even if i hit differents players, and i thing a lot of players have the same problem.) This mecanic is known by alot of players. My suggestion with is also a poll : Should admins up the "cap" (the amount) of ap nesserasy to be capped? (If possible delet it except if you gain ap from the same player) As usualy : feel free to discust about this topic, stay polite and respect the rules of forum

Try killing boxes as aethertech... Mages at least have dots especially spiritmaster + his pet. So if you are re doing this event are you gonna take in consideration all the feedback or just the Tempering Solutions' feedback ? I get it it's supposed to be a PvP event to fight over boxes. But the problem is that the boxes have too much hp to kill and what's worse if people from your own faction can steal the box from you even if you start killing it before them just because their class kills it way faster and loot unlock for the one dealing the most dps on the box. So it doesn't matter if you always find boxes first and almost kill them if another better class for the job just comes by and yoink it. Not even gonna talk about zerging from both factions (yes consider you are solo and you found a box then a group of people same faction just comes and steal it). If you can change opening the boxes as a casting when you click on them like how the boxes for halloween event in Silentra, not "who deals the most amount of 1 dmg faster", this would be good and fair for everyone and open world PvP would still be there. Also consider spreading them equally around the map and having a bit of a random spawn time so no camping. People must be moving constantly looking for them and fighting with opposite faction.

Before everything i repost this pos with has been closed by @Admin due to debates with has gone too far... I guess this subject is important and it interests a lot of peoples here. So please stay calm, polite with the staff and other players, and follow the rules in place on this forum. Hello, As everyone seen it the server gp system is not the same of retail (the amount of gp deleted every day at 12.00 is doubled) By looking at the ranking we can see that there is huge différences in the ranking and that even if some peoples afk for 2 or 3 months they should be able to keep their places in the top. (we can take the example of BigPanda, he did 100/200 gp on a week since 2 months and he is still great general) Back to gameforge this type of ranking system already allowed to some peoples to just fucked up the faction by playing against the interests of his own faction. I talked a lot with players and people proposed a simple reset of gp. Obviously i was not really for this option, it is far too much punitive for players that farm their gp since the start of the server. So, there is servals options to having a top player active and keep the server and siege alive. I didn't affirm this option is the best but i would propose you to update again the ranking system to allow new players to reach top xforms make the server more attractive... This system is pretty simple: At every end of the season (30 days) the amount of gp of everyone is decreased by 30 to 60% (50 seems to be good) There is a lot of advantages: More active xforms, new player's experiences of the game is increased... And this system is also fair for peoples who farm gp since the start of the server. because they can keep the top xform that they worked during months for. If you have any ideas to improve and make the ranking system feel free to answer to this tickets and vote.

they are not gonne switch to 4.8 becouse they make money on manastones system

@Admin If you make the same mistake as the official by thinking only of the money that the server brings back by listening only to the people who Cash shop like Reconquista. In a month the server will be gone again. Russians are lost no need to take their advice

You both talked well.... Balaur : You haven't the backstages of leading, when hametsu and I came to this server we had a great hipe, but even at this time there were still a big problem of following in the elysean faction. And we goes a bit out of the topic, but siege is kinda linked to rank. The think that elysean don't realy follow was and is because most of them didn't even see the calls, we haven't vocal (or maximum 30 ppl on it) and we are maximum 130 on league. So when we have 250/300 ppl on the map, maximum 150 see the call in this 150, 60 to 70 will follow it. You can't win a siege with 70ppl. The only think to do is having a vocal (mumble or teamspeak cuz discord devs are too dumb to make a whisper fonction on it...) and having a maximum of peoples on it. Option 2 is to have a commender who can follow and repeat the moves. The real think is we don't care that gussi didn't follow calls, they are selfish asfuck we all know it... Btw hametsu stop the lead for 3 main reasons : 1 elysean stop follow, 2 Asmo can't do a siege without spying on elysean accounts 3: we were alone to planed everything

Having no leader is part of the elyos problem but it is irrelevant to the topic. Having inactive xforms is another issue and it affects both sides although not equally.

I gave up my xform on Elyos side voluntarily because of how messy the sieges are. You cannot expect people to participate in sieges forever when there is no unity, no coherence and no coordination. Sieges should be fun, but every single siege we had except 1 week or so when Hametsu was the fresh leader has been nothing but GP farming, zerg vs zerg with no actual purpose and no challenging fights to be had. It's just contribution hunting. Why would you want an xform rank when there is nothing to do with it. You can follow the leaders calls all you want but 1, 5 or even 10 xforms will not make a difference in the long run. You need the league to listen and people to be on VoIP to follow commands and provide feedback to the leaders quickly, otherwise it will never work. Also, it did not take me long to get 5 star at all. I was almost general before I stopped (on Elyos side), and I never even did arena of harmony, arena of glory, engulfen ophidan bridge, kamar battlefield or iron wall warfront. All I did was go to siege everyday and do bastion and my solo arenas. Almost general in a bit more than 2 months of active playing. That is nothing. Climbing the ranks on this server is incredibly easy. On retail I had 128 000 glory points and I was not even close to reaching 5 star after 3 years of active playing.

I answer NO. Admins shouldn't change anything. Just do not be late for siege, go with the league and get your GP. Otherwise people will just level up the character of opposite race and bring him to siege to farm ap and get GP. Siege is for war and unification of race, not for farm. Developers were right to prevent AP trading. Just enjoy the game and play the way it's intended. Do not turn sieges into shit.

@Admin Voted LMAO, i guess you can just close the topic, keep closing your eyes on what happen on your server and enjoy the 60% player décreased after the end of quarantine cuz siege still fucked up and ppl are boring. Btw i would have made the same answer no matter your vote the fact that you as admin you vote instead of just earing the community and come back to us with an answer after a discussion with the staff to explain to us why the staff's position is for a change or against it, maybe it is just not possible cuz technical issues idk... I am sorry, but for me, the role of the staff team is not to vote, you can debate it is not a problem, it is always a good thing... And at the end after taking into consideration every point of view and technical issues come back to us to explain your decision.