YEG

Step 1 : They will not considerate your vote ! Step 2 : enjoy this parody

Probably banned for no reasons, like 50 to 60% of thoses "3000 players"

Make the entry in safe area no?...

LMAO Did we cry for ceranium when elyos was dominated??? Like motivate ppl, find a lead, and fight. Stop crybabe for cera that u don't deserved by afking at siege...

GP and gear are 2 things completely different... And what should do is a management of the GP system as u did at the start of serv by x2 the dayly lost. And why not include players to this management, with some vote or others things like that... the ideas for an improvement of the system are many and had already been sent and explain to everyone on this forum. In fact, in siege you do less contribution if you are in allience only cuz the average of AP that ur allience collect is less than what u do alone. so obviously you get less contribution. If you go with an optimised allience you have alot of chances to makes full r1 (except obv is a solo player makes more ap than all of u / number of ppl in alli)

Win glory arena 50 times

Hello, since some of staffs members that use abusive ban on discord leave the staff, can we have a ./unbann all on the discord ?

Biche plz... Painter aka la classe la plus retard du jeux qu'esque tu veut qu'elle foute en 4.6? ouloulou rayon tous le moinde est mort go google trad

Both sides in siege focus dux like autistic ppl we never have a proper fight, but ure right that we outnumber you when there is a "lead"... "Balance" of ely side is bad mostly cuz of bad call, and it is the same in asmo side... Ararma have most of french ppl who don't wana follow his lead, and when french tryed smth, ararma's friends didn't followed lyue... Thing is if ure devide u can't win siege specificlu when ure outnumbered or that the calls are bad... The gap is not huge (i meen in term of number) And have always exist (when i arrived ely was outnumbered on siege only cuz ppl didn't come at siege) i guess at this moment it is the same on asmo side

Could be a great idea, but obviously with some restrictions like a half or full reset GP and obviously, can move only from the most to less populated side... If not the server will be onesided and it will be boring

5. to use programs modifying game client and giving advantages in the game in not-gaming way (Shugo console, WTFast and similar are allowed). Punishment: permanent ban of all player’s accounts and of all those giving him/her their accounts in terms of their possible engagement;

I don't think admins will answer on those mechanics, the only reason u have is to make yours ownes recherches or find the work of another... Fine a mob witch u have the drop rate (obviously a decent drop rate, or u will have to do really long series of farming to have ur answers) (previously the aion database was complete and could give you a lot of information on every drop rates of every mob) It is sad if admins didn't anwser on this cuz they have a commend on the serv to know the drops rates.

One young and wise gladiator said one day : "he is tping he is tping he is tping" Things ended well by a beautiful 4 or 3 rd place

Sorry, but no, this is factually false there is tons of things with are differents from Retail, for me, some good, some bads... Everyone have a different opinion on it I will just take 3 exemples : Canons on siege Bombs on dredgions The amount of GP decreased every days And as i said there are tons of other things which are different from retail... You can't just pretend it is offi like cuz the rate are the same...

Maybe i explained my self bad... But for my self, it concerns the siege and mass pvp in general. There is no point with traders, in contrary traders will have fewer advantages: No cap ap mean if the trader wants his rank 1 he will have to bring his acc more time than others kill enemies (With at a moment start to be obvious and he can get banned easily) Actually for peoples with aoe, if they fight on sillus, even 3-4 minutes they have to afk 5 mins to get rewards again it deserved siege.... And you ask about league, but it would be the same with an efficient alliance... Obv is i make aoe for 24 peoples il will take me around 20-30 mins to reach the cap and by this time i will be uncaped) But i am sorry, what's the point of PL alliances members that are afk on the back lane? do you really think it is better for the faction? For me it is far better to encourage peoples to make more and more ap to reach rank 1, in that way, peoples will have to impact on enemies to makes ap. As i introduce it for me this mechanic is old and useless since the rank is not anymore in AP. Just punish ap trade, set the settings to stop win ap after like 5 or 6 kill on the same target. And uncap the overall ap cap from 25-35k to 150-200k... Because for the moment if you hit multiple target, in 1 or 2 minutes of siege you are capp, and it is useless to push anymore, you will get nothing more...

Hello everyone As most players know, there is an old mechanic with making you stop winning ap from players when you gain too much of them in a short period of time. Originally this mechanic was made to prevent of ap trading between players when the ranking was still in AP. Actually the system is on ap and the cap ap is also good to prevent from ap trade (if u kill the same player x time in y mins you will not gain any ap...) with is good. But as i explain to Goldaion admins with are "probably" the same as EuroAion ones, this becomes a problem on mass pvp (At every siege, after 2 minutes i can't win any ap even if i hit differents players, and i thing a lot of players have the same problem.) This mecanic is known by alot of players. My suggestion with is also a poll : Should admins up the "cap" (the amount) of ap nesserasy to be capped? (If possible delet it except if you gain ap from the same player) As usualy : feel free to discust about this topic, stay polite and respect the rules of forum

Saddly not a new event

Before everything i repost this pos with has been closed by @Admin due to debates with has gone too far... I guess this subject is important and it interests a lot of peoples here. So please stay calm, polite with the staff and other players, and follow the rules in place on this forum. Hello, As everyone seen it the server gp system is not the same of retail (the amount of gp deleted every day at 12.00 is doubled) By looking at the ranking we can see that there is huge différences in the ranking and that even if some peoples afk for 2 or 3 months they should be able to keep their places in the top. (we can take the example of BigPanda, he did 100/200 gp on a week since 2 months and he is still great general) Back to gameforge this type of ranking system already allowed to some peoples to just fucked up the faction by playing against the interests of his own faction. I talked a lot with players and people proposed a simple reset of gp. Obviously i was not really for this option, it is far too much punitive for players that farm their gp since the start of the server. So, there is servals options to having a top player active and keep the server and siege alive. I didn't affirm this option is the best but i would propose you to update again the ranking system to allow new players to reach top xforms make the server more attractive... This system is pretty simple: At every end of the season (30 days) the amount of gp of everyone is decreased by 30 to 60% (50 seems to be good) There is a lot of advantages: More active xforms, new player's experiences of the game is increased... And this system is also fair for peoples who farm gp since the start of the server. because they can keep the top xform that they worked during months for. If you have any ideas to improve and make the ranking system feel free to answer to this tickets and vote.

Hello, As everyone seen it the server gp system is not the same of retail (the amount of gp deleted every day at 12.00 is doubled) By looking at the ranking we can see that there is huge différences in the ranking and that even if some peoples afk for 2 or 3 months they should be able to keep their places in the top. (we can take the example of BigPanda, he did 100/200 gp on a week since 2 months and he is still great general) Back to gameforge this type of ranking system already allowed to some peoples to just fucked up the faction by playing against the interests of his own faction. I talked a lot with players and people proposed a simple reset of gp. Obviously i was not really for this option, it is far too much punitive for players that farm their gp since the start of the server. So, there is servals options to having a top player active and keep the server and siege alive. I didn't affirm this option is the best but i would propose you to update again the ranking system to allow new players to reach top xforms make the server more attractive... This system is pretty simple: At every end of the season (30 days) the amount of gp of everyone is decreased by 30 to 60% (50 seems to be good) There is a lot of advantages: More active xforms, new player's experiences of the game is increased... And this system is also fair for peoples who farm gp since the start of the server. because they can keep the top xform that they worked during months for. If you have any ideas to improve and make the ranking system feel free to answer to this tickets and vote.

@Admin Voted LMAO, i guess you can just close the topic, keep closing your eyes on what happen on your server and enjoy the 60% player décreased after the end of quarantine cuz siege still fucked up and ppl are boring. Btw i would have made the same answer no matter your vote the fact that you as admin you vote instead of just earing the community and come back to us with an answer after a discussion with the staff to explain to us why the staff's position is for a change or against it, maybe it is just not possible cuz technical issues idk... I am sorry, but for me, the role of the staff team is not to vote, you can debate it is not a problem, it is always a good thing... And at the end after taking into consideration every point of view and technical issues come back to us to explain your decision.

We never have 3 siege a day, maximum was katalam+abys in same day. And gf have always suck on his classement management, they do fully reset but none know when or why. The do only 1 none fully reset and it was for the 4.5 update when ranking pass from AP to GP it was a /1000 (you had 1 000 000 ap, tadam u have 1000 gp)

You both talked well.... Balaur : You haven't the backstages of leading, when hametsu and I came to this server we had a great hipe, but even at this time there were still a big problem of following in the elysean faction. And we goes a bit out of the topic, but siege is kinda linked to rank. The think that elysean don't realy follow was and is because most of them didn't even see the calls, we haven't vocal (or maximum 30 ppl on it) and we are maximum 130 on league. So when we have 250/300 ppl on the map, maximum 150 see the call in this 150, 60 to 70 will follow it. You can't win a siege with 70ppl. The only think to do is having a vocal (mumble or teamspeak cuz discord devs are too dumb to make a whisper fonction on it...) and having a maximum of peoples on it. Option 2 is to have a commender who can follow and repeat the moves. The real think is we don't care that gussi didn't follow calls, they are selfish asfuck we all know it... Btw hametsu stop the lead for 3 main reasons : 1 elysean stop follow, 2 Asmo can't do a siege without spying on elysean accounts 3: we were alone to planed everything

Ok, my bad on this interpretation^^ Yes i was not here and as the story i eared, there were a deal to don't tutch eatch other forts ath this time between asmo and elyos (maybe i am wrong and ppl told me bullshit, but this is another story) To be honest i had already think about the system to move afk ppl from Classement and initially, i arrived at the same conclusion as you we have to remove ppl from their rank if they didn't do enough gp and after they can come back if they were active again. The system already exists but is pretty useless at this moment... And i arrived at the conclusion that this is a good thing for afk, but it is still not fair for new players. To be honnest i don't think you have to give up every rank 1 in siege... Be in alliance (or more optimized if u have the calls in the vocal as u do in an optimized group) can allow you to have rank 1 even if some player make some solo contri, but obviously your group have to don't be afk...) 1 month ago we had a group and we still managed to get nearly full rank1... And don't forget that you can have the rewards from the defense of a fortress. I don't think you will be outranked, at least if you try hard a bit, i think u can manage to keep it up to the time you get boring and you start to stop the siege. Making 6 Hyperions a week is only 200hp more/7 days. Dumbs ppl didn't grind the ranking the only reason immer is at the top of this ranking is that he bought his acc nearly 20k gp and the fact that the character is playing since the start

Please stop using sophisme... I sayed 30 to 60% (and 50 seems good for me) don't be so dramatic like a oh my god they will reset all my gp that i farm since month !!! Your last intervention seems to me more "thinked" (well i didn't had the word but u understand) I understand your position. but now think as a new elyos player passionate as you by siege.... He spawn on the server he have 13k hp to do to get xform ant the time he climb it based on actual evolution he will have 15k. And the server was not truely active between January and February now with COVID we gain a lot of population so obvious he will have to do more hp also to keep it. Now think about a player that come in like 3 or 4 month, like i did on Gold Aion i came late, and it took me 3 months to climb a 5star. And because of the fact the xform were locked up, the siege on the server was just dead. Same think will happen to EuroAion. Dead sieges rush gp sieges no fun att all. You talked about last silus siege that the fact we used 3 waves of xforms (don't be foul, the xforms was not coordinated, and we took the fortress only bcs you hadn't lead, hadn't league, and the defenders didn't do their job) In fact in every siege your xform push is a way more impactful and you can't say the contrary, in 1 entire month of siege we win only 1 xform vs xform fight : we had hellfire array....) Again, this system have not for only goal to punish top-ranking xforms (as i will punish my self also, and i don't realy like BDSM...) but just to balance it a bit. Gameforge did full reset without any warning, this was too extreme... We have to find a balanced way to manage this problem... Your solution with a cap to 1000 gp could maybe solve the afk problem. But the fact that you react like this on the thread is kinda disappointing me, i thought you were less selfish.

"he does down quite quickly" Balaur... I taken the exemple of bigpanda 2 month i am here he did nearly 0 gp and he is still on top rank.. I am agree that the system we have is better than the normal one but for me it is not enouth (and i am already grand general and i will also lost faster my xform is i stop, but it is normal.) "он довольно быстро падает" Балаур ... Я взял пример с бигпанды 2 месяца, я здесь, он сделал почти 0 gp, и он все еще на вершине рейтинга .. Я согласен с тем, что наша система лучше, чем обычная, но для меня она не лучшая (и я уже генерал, и я тоже потеряю быстрее, моя форма - я останов (Sorry google trad)